Predictors of Severe Perineal Tear during Delivery in Yenagoa, Southern Nigeria

Main Article Content

Ikobho Ebenezer Howells
Isaac Joel Abasi

Abstract

Background:Perineal tear is a very common complication of vaginal delivery, and it is often mild. However, when severe, it could result in torrential life threatening hemorrhage and anal sphincter injury, with fecal incontinence.

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the predictors of severe perineal tear (3rd and 4th degree tear), using mild perineal tear (1st and 2nd degree) as control. It would also determine the rate of perineal tear, and the maternal and fetal demographic risk factor associated with it.

Materials and Methods: This was an analytic observational study of 186 women who had perineal tear during vaginal delivery. Out of these, 19 women had severe (3rd and 4th degree) perineal tear, also known as obstetrics anal sphincter injury (OASI). This was compared to 167 women who had mild perineal tear (1st and 2nd degree) during the study period.

Maternal demographic information retrieved was maternal age, parity, educational level, and occupation. Obstetrics factors were booking status, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, rank of the accoucheur (nurse or doctor), and degree of perineal tear. Fetal demographic data was birth weight and fetal sex.

Categorical variables were compared with odds ratio, difference in mean was compared with student’s t-test, and the degree of association for quantitative variables was determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Predictor variables were determined using simple logistic regression, and multivariate analysis. Confidence interval was set at 95%, and statistical significance was set at p value of < 0.05.

Results: The prevalence of OASI (3rd and 4th degree perineal tear) in Yenagoa was 1.1%. The significant risk factors were women of younger age, odds ratio = 1.04(0.37, 2.87) with p = 0.04, low parity, odds ratio = 0.20(0.07, 0.55) with p = 0.008, low educational background, odd ratio = 18.9(5.92, 60.81), and birth weight ≥ 4kg, odds ratio = 0.30[0.09, 1.06] with p = 0.04.

Using simple liner regression, the most significant predictors for severe perineal tear were mode delivery (r2 = 65.5%), and educational level (r2 = 30.0%). However, on stepwise multivariate analysis, these two factors accounted for 68.5%.

Conclusion: The rate of severe perineal tear is relatively low in Yenagoa, Nigeria, and comparable to what obtains in many countries. The most significant predictors were mode of delivery and educational level. Careful selection of the mode of delivery, especially instrumental vaginal deliveries, and women empowerment could minimize the rate in our environment.

Keywords:
Vaginal delivery, severe perineal tear, predictors, Yenagoa

Article Details

How to Cite
Howells, I. E., & Abasi, I. J. (2021). Predictors of Severe Perineal Tear during Delivery in Yenagoa, Southern Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 10(2), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrimps/2021/v10i230162
Section
Original Research Article

References

SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): Prevention, recognition, and repair. No 330. J ObstetGynaecol Can. 2015;37(12):1131–1148.

de Jesús-García A, Paredes-Solís S, Valtierra-Gil G. et al. Associations with perineal trauma during childbirth at home and in health facilities in indigenous municipalities in southern Mexico: A cross-sectional cluster survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18.2018; 198.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1836-8

Royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists (RCOG). Third- and Fourth-degree Perineal Tears, Management. Green-top Guideline No. 29; 2015.

Aigmueller T, UmekElenskaiaK, Frudinger A, Pfeifer J, Hellmer H, et al. Guidelines for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth, - Austrian urogynecologic working group (AUB). GeburtshFrauenheilk. 2013; 73:407–11.

Florent YF, Félix E, Lovlyne TK, Jeanne HF, Jovanny TF, Robinson EM. Risk factors of genital tract lacerations at yaoundé central hospital - Cameroon: A case control study. BJMMR. 2017; 20(2):1- 8.

Ikobho Ebenezer Howells, Isaac Joel Abasi. Genital tract lacerations in women delivered by medical doctors at the niger delta university teaching hospital, Southern Nigeria. ARJGO. 2018;1(1):1-10.
DOI: 10.9734/ARJGO/2018/42474

Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):927 - 937.
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000720
PMID: 25751203.

NirMelamed, Gavish OZ, Michal Eisner, ArnonWiznitzer, NirWasserberg,YarivYogev. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears – incidence and risk factors. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2013;26(7):660–4.

Jandér C, Lyrenäs S. Third and fourth degree perineal tears. Predictor factors in a referral hospital. ActaObstetGynecol Scand. 2001;80(3):229-34.
PMID: 11207488.

Woolner AM, Ayansina D, Black M, Bhattacharya S. The impact of third- or fourth-degree perineal tears on the second pregnancy: A cohort study of 182,445 Scottish women. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0215180.
DOI. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215180

Von Theobald P, Bohrer M, Lorrain S, Iacobelli S. Risk factors associated with severe perineal tears: A five-year study. J GynecolObstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(7):101820.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101820

Al-Ghamdi T, Al-Thaydi AH, Chamsi AT, Al Mardawi E.Incidence and risk factors for development of third and fourth degree perineal tears: A four year experience in a single Saudi center. J Women's Health Care. 2018; 7:423.
DOI:10.4172/2167-0420.1000423

Egbe TO, Kadzem LN, Takang WA, Tchounzou R, Egbe EN, Prevalence and risk factors of perineal tears at the limbe regional hospital, cameroon. Int J ReprodFertil Sex Health. 2016; 3(3):70-8.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-1887-1600013

Waldenström U, Ekéus C. Risk factors for obstetrics anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: A population-based register study. BMC Pregnancy Child Birth. 2017;307.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1473-7

Jandér C, Lyrenäs S. Third and fourth degree perineal tears. Predictor factors in a referral hospital. ActaObstetGynecol Scand. 2001;80(3):229-34.
PMID: 11207488

Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V. et al. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: A prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(59).
Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-59

Daniel TarekegnWorede, SimegnAlemu, TesfaBirlewTsegaye. Risk factors for severe perineal laceration among vaginally delivered mothers in public hospitals in Ethiopia: Unmatched case control study. Prim Health Care. 2020; 10(4):001-005.

Quality statement 3: Instrumental Vaginal Birth. Australian commission on safety and quality in health care. Severe Perineal Tears Clinical Care Standard. Consultation draft. Sydney: ACSQHC. 2019;18–21.

Hans Peter Dietz. Forceps: Towards obsolescence or revival? ActaObstetGynecol Scand. 2015; 94:347–51.

Markus Harry Jansson, Karin Franzén, AyakoHiyoshi, GunillaTegerstedt, Hedda Dahlgren, Kerstin Nilsson. Risk factors for perineal and vaginal tears in primiparous women – the prospective POPRACT-cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20:749.
DOI.ORG/10.1186/S12884-020-03447-0

Alice Cola, Matteo Frigerio, Stefano Manodoro, Debora Verri, Maria LietaInterdonato, et al. Third and fourth degree perineal tears: Incidence and risk factors in an Italian setting. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016; 206:27.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.095

Frohlich J, Kettle C. Perineal care. BMJ ClinEvid. 2015;1401.
PMID: 21481287

Ryan Goh, Daryl Goh, HasthikaEllepola.Perineal tears – A review. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (AJGP). 2018; 47(2):35–8.

Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: A prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59.

Ahmed M Abbas, Fatma MKamel, Safwat A Salman. Prophylactic episiotomy for prevention of perineal tears in women with high striaegravidarum score.AJOG. 2019;220(1):436.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.680

Mazur-Bialy AI, Kołomańska-Bogucka D, Opławski M, Tim S. Physiotherapy for prevention and treatment of fecal incontinence in women—Systematic review of methods. J. Clin. Med.2020; 9:3255.
Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103255

Dieb AS, Shoab AY, Nabil H, et al.Perineal massage and training reduces perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: A randomized controlled trial. IntUrogynecol J. 2020;31.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03937-6

Galal M, Symonds I, Smith R. Postterm pregnancy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(3):175–87.

Charlotte Jande´R, Sven Lyrena S. Third and fourth degree perineal tears - Predictor factors in a referral hospital.ActaObstetGynecol Scand. 2001;80:229–34.